Why is ntpclients/ntploggps.py in ntpsec rather than gpsd?

[Richard Laager]

On 12/12/18 2:59 PM, Gary E. Miller via devel wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Dec 2018 22:52:07 -0800
> Hal Murray via devel <devel at ntpsec.org> wrote:
>> Is there reason not to move it to gpsd?  And most gpsd could care
>> less?  Its only use is with ntpd.
> 
> Maybe because gpsd does not use it?

>> If we want to keep it here, should we remove the ntp (version string) 
>> dependency and move it to contrib?
> 
> Nope, it is important for ntpviz users to have it.  It should be a
> full partner in NTPsec.

I agree. ntploggps is only used when you're using your GPS for NTP,
which is far more of an NTP thing than a GPS thing.

-- 
Richard

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ntpsec.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20181212/bb2c059e/attachment.bin>