Why is ntpclients/ntploggps.py in ntpsec rather than gpsd?

[Gary E. Miller]

Yo Hal!

On Tue, 11 Dec 2018 22:52:07 -0800
Hal Murray via devel <devel at ntpsec.org> wrote:

> James Browning said:
> > I think because it started out as a helper script for ntpviz. You
> > should blame me for the name though I moved it last.   
> 
> Is there reason not to move it to gpsd?  And most gpsd could care
> less?  Its only use is with ntpd.

Maybe because gpsd does not use it?

> This is another tangle similar to the NetBSD/curses mess with ntpmon.

No, that is a whole 'nother level of mess.

> If we want to keep it here, should we remove the ntp (version string) 
> dependency and move it to contrib?

Nope, it is important for ntpviz users to have it.  It should be a
full partner in NTPsec.

RGDS
GARY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703
	gem at rellim.com  Tel:+1 541 382 8588

	    Veritas liberabit vos. -- Quid est veritas?
    "If you can’t measure it, you can’t improve it." - Lord Kelvin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 851 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ntpsec.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20181212/3e99d69d/attachment.bin>