ntpviz - Don't plot a line during data absence
Gary E. Miller
gem at rellim.com
Sun Oct 23 21:04:51 UTC 2016
Yo Hal!
On Sun, 23 Oct 2016 13:39:32 -0700
Hal Murray <hmurray at megapathdsl.net> wrote:
> gem at rellim.com said:
> >> If the polling interval is X, there may be up to 8X gaps in
> >> peerstats.
> > Ah, lost me. Say what?
>
> Look at the time differences between samples for an IP Address in
> peerstats.
>
> If the polling interval is X, there will be a line in rawstats for
> each packet received. If none are lost, the spacing will be X.
Where X is by default 64 sec, and by default can be ramped up to 1024
sec.
So the current line break hack does not plot a line longer than 1024
sec. Lines of 1024 sec are plotted. That will not work for folks
setting maxpoll over 1024 sec.
> There is a filter between the raw packets and the ones that come out
> of peerstats. It has a buffer of the last 8 samples. It only uses
> the one with the lowest round trip time. So if you get 8 samples in
> a row with increasing RTT, the last 7 will get saved until the a new
> sample bumps the first one out of the buffer.
Why do we care? Don't we still get a sample, of some sort, every X?
> Refclocks samples always get through. I assume it takes new samples
> when the RTT is equal but there might be a simple special case test.
Aren't reclocks local? Thus no rtt?
Is there anything to try in real plots.
RGDS
GARY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703
gem at rellim.com Tel:+1 541 382 8588
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 455 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.ntpsec.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20161023/9f4c64b2/attachment.bin>
More information about the devel
mailing list