I'm giving up on seccomp

[Eric S. Raymond]

Hal Murray <hmurray at megapathdsl.net>:
> Is this an opportunity to clean up that area?

I don't think so. It's pretty clean now, functionally speaking - I put
a lot of work into rationalizing the configurator structures and the
way they talk to the protocol machine.

I suppose it might be if we were willing to make
cimparibility-breaking changes to the configuration grammar, but I
have not been presented with any good reason to do that.
-- 
		<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a>