Let's get moving on NTS

[Gary E. Miller]

Yo Ian!

On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 17:19:22 -0600
Ian Bruene via devel <devel at ntpsec.org> wrote:

> On 01/06/2019 05:11 PM, Gary E. Miller via devel wrote:
> > Which is a big doc, so I'm still not sure which part we are talking
> > about here...  
> 
> /devel/nts.doc is a new, and currently very small, file.
> 
> You are thinking of the NTS draft.

Best not to tell me what I am thinking, until you read minds.  I was
specifically referring to nts.adoc.

> > That is a bad way to think of this.  What you call "terrible" and
> > "unnecessary" ideas are what I see as the baby steps and directed
> > walk towards a barely perceived goal.
> > [SNIP]  
> 
> Yes. This particular idea was one of the first that lost the 
> competition. That baby step already took place which is why I
> squawked at nts.adoc's phrasing implying that it still existed.

Thoughts preceed the doc, they'll gradually sync up as we feel this
elephant.

RGDS
GARY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703
	gem at rellim.com  Tel:+1 541 382 8588

	    Veritas liberabit vos. -- Quid est veritas?
    "If you can’t measure it, you can’t improve it." - Lord Kelvin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 851 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ntpsec.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20190106/ba4336da/attachment.bin>