Going forward with NTS

[Eric S. Raymond]

Hal Murray <hmurray at megapathdsl.net>:
> 
> esr at thyrsus.com said:
> > I think we'd best completely avoid writing an NTS-KE server until we have
> > tested our client side against one of the two existing server
> > implementations. 
> 
> Then we have to learn how to drive the existing implementations, and learn 
> enough about how they operate so we can insert printfs for debugging.  I think 
> I'd be happier working with code and people I'm familiar with.

Understandable. I feel the same way.

Don't you think it makes sense to very our client code against a known-good
implementation first, though?
-- 
		<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a>

My work is funded by the Internet Civil Engineering Institute: https://icei.org
Please visit their site and donate: the civilization you save might be your own.