"serverMime-Version: 1.0

[Gary E. Miller]

Yo Hal!

On Wed, 03 Apr 2019 13:12:58 -0700
Hal Murray via devel <devel at ntpsec.org> wrote:

> > Why?  Well, my IPv6 connections have much less latency and jitter
> > than my IPv4 ones.  Without -4 and -6 on the NTP part of NTS I
> > can't make those comparisons easily.   
> 
> If you put the -4 after the "server", it does both the KE and NTP
> using -4.
> 
> Is there a reason you need to do KE over one and NTP over the other?

We seem to be in an echo chamber, been here many times already:

1. testing

2. firewall avoiding.  As demonstrated by the hackathon.

3. I see big differences in jitter and latency between IPv4 and IPv6.
   I want to characterize the diffeence, then select the best.

> Implementation details:

I'll leave that to you the implementor.

> Just curious.  What sort of setup are you using where IPv6 is
> significantly better than IPv4?

Beats me.  All I can see is different paths using traceroute, mtr, etc.

Not unusual for ISPs and backbones to route IPv4 and IPv6 over different
hardware.  They don't tell me why...

RGDS
GARY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703
	gem at rellim.com  Tel:+1 541 382 8588

	    Veritas liberabit vos. -- Quid est veritas?
    "If you can’t measure it, you can’t improve it." - Lord Kelvin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 851 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ntpsec.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20190403/3762faae/attachment.bin>