SINGLEBUFFER

[Mark Atwood, Project Manager]

Thank you Hal!

On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 4:53 PM Hal Murray via devel <devel at ntpsec.org>
wrote:

>
> It's simple, at least conceptually.  I'm embarrassed I didn't see it
> (much)
> sooner.
>
> The general idea with the old code is:
>
> From several places deep in ntp_io
>   read data into rb
>   rb->receiver = xxx
>   add_full_recv_buffer(rb)
>
> then way up in ntpd:
>   rb = get_full_recv_buffer()
>   (rb->receiver)(rb)
>   freerecvbuf(rb)
>
> So all we have to do is remove the second chunk and replace the first
> chunk
> with:
>   read data into rb
>   xxx(rb)
>   freerecvbuf(rb)
>
> The first chunk actually happens in several places, one for packets,
> another
> for refclocks, ...
>
> I've got it working.  I'll push in a day or so.  There is lots of checking
> and
> cleanup to do.
>
>
> --
> These are my opinions.  I hate spam.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> devel at ntpsec.org
> http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
-- 

Mark Atwood
http://about.me/markatwood
+1-206-604-2198
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ntpsec.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20180920/a5a93092/attachment.html>