Request for design critique - configuration directories

[Gary E. Miller]

Yo Eric!

On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 19:04:50 -0400
"Eric S. Raymond" <esr at thyrsus.com> wrote:

> Gary E. Miller <gem at rellim.com>:
> > Not any Apache snippet I have ever seen.  I have seen no Apache
> > with file suffixes.  Got a link to an example?  
> 
> The file suffixes for designating which program interprets the snippet
> are my addition.  The idea I got from apache was leaving the inactive
> snippet content in the directory.  Mark tells me the distribution
> packagers like this kind of config organization because it makes
> their scripts simpler.

We are conflating two things.  The part Achim and I disagree with you on
is the suffixes.  Nothing more.  The rest, directories of snippets, is
how I see current practice to be and is fine.  Beter than fine: good.

RGDS
GARY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703
	gem at rellim.com  Tel:+1 541 382 8588

	    Veritas liberabit vos. -- Quid est veritas?
    "If you can’t measure it, you can’t improve it." - Lord Kelvin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ntpsec.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20170323/4de9ea8d/attachment.bin>