sys_fuzz

[Hal Murray]

gem at rellim.com said:
> You gotta squint real hard to see that as stiction, but not worth=20
> debating the proper word.  So it may have mattered back then, but do we need
> to carry this legacy code. 

Stiction is when something that should go smoothly goes in jumps.  That seems 
like a reasonable description of a clock that gets updated by timer ticks 
with no interpolation.


> The has nothing to do with clock steps, this has to do with how fast the
> clock can be read. 

That may be what a comment, but I'm pretty sure the idea is to help with the 
case of a clock that takes big steps.


-- 
These are my opinions.  I hate spam.