Should the HAVE_KERNEL_PLL conditional be abolished?

[Eric S. Raymond]

John D. Bell <jdb at systemsartisans.com>:
>     A thought from out of left field here -
> 
>     Would it be possible to simplify the code by using a tool to
> partially pre-process the code (e.g. CPPP
> (http://www.muppetlabs.com/~breadbox/software/cppp.html)), defining in
> turn HAVE_KERNEL_PPS and HAVE_PPSAPI, and then comparing the resultant
> "versions"?
> 
>     This _might_ give you the ability to see the 'shape' of the code
> under the various assumptions about supported kernel features, etc.

I might try it.  By I suspect the loss of context will make such a report
less than useful.
-- 
		<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a>

My work is funded by the Internet Civil Engineering Institute: https://icei.org
Please visit their site and donate: the civilization you save might be your own.