warnings, attic/sht.c

Hal Murray hmurray at megapathdsl.net
Sat Apr 8 20:20:48 UTC 2017

gem at rellim.com said:
>> I don't know what the right fix is.
> So the fix is to include ntp.h.  I thought I had already done that.
>> Is sht supposed to be stand-alone?
> Yes. 

Maybe I should have said build-alone rather than stand-alone.

It currently doesn't include ntp.h and only gets one warning (on my setup).

So if we change it to use some other randomness, we can remove the linking
with our libraries.

>> I just pushed fixes for a couple of warnings.
> I do not understand this one:
> Cool, thanks. 

I don't understand what you don't understand.

After a git pull, I ran tests/option-tester.sh on a Fedora system.
It found 3 warnings.  I fixed 2 of them. The 3rd is discussed above.

> Only 800 more warning messages to fix...

Are you using an optional flag or unpushed change to get those?  I'm only 
seeing one warning, the one from sht.

These are my opinions.  I hate spam.

More information about the devel mailing list