Another maxpoll mixup

[Gary E. Miller]

Yo Hal!

On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 01:32:00 -0700
Hal Murray <hmurray at megapathdsl.net> wrote:

> From ntp.conf:
> server 0.centos.pool.ntp.org iburst
> server 1.centos.pool.ntp.org iburst
> server 2.centos.pool.ntp.org iburst
> server 3.centos.pool.ntp.org iburst
> (no "max" in ntp.conf)

I thought we had found all the paths where the magic value 'unknown'
maxpoll had to be changed to the final real maxpoll.  Any idea where the
maxpoll is not being checked and set?

We have:
    ntp_config.c line 2921
    ntp_perr.c 766

I do not see anywhere else maxpoll was previsouly checked for the magic
zero.

I also thought that every initialization path already checked for
maxpoll > NTP_MAXPOLL.  Maybe it was previsouly caught be a minpoll >
maxpoll check?

Ideas?

RGDS
GARY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703
	gem at rellim.com  Tel:+1 541 382 8588
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.ntpsec.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20160927/446081c4/attachment.bin>