NTPsec's longer-term objectives

[Eric S. Raymond]

Hal Murray <hmurray at megapathdsl.net>:
> 
> esr at thyrsus.com said:
> > While this is in some ways a tempting thought, I think the energy we might
> > spend on this would be better directed towards a newer language that *is*
> > suitable for soft realtime and has good provability properties for security.
> >  Rust or Go seem like the obvious candidates. 
> 
> How widely available are Rust and/or Go?

Every Unix-like system, for sure.  Checking...Rust has a Windows port.
So does Go.  Are there any other tarhets you're worried about?
-- 
		<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a>