NTPsec's longer-term objectives

[Hal Murray]

esr at thyrsus.com said:
> While this is in some ways a tempting thought, I think the energy we might
> spend on this would be better directed towards a newer language that *is*
> suitable for soft realtime and has good provability properties for security.
>  Rust or Go seem like the obvious candidates. 

How widely available are Rust and/or Go?


-- 
These are my opinions.  I hate spam.