ntpq: cruft/doc

[Hal Murray]

esr at thyrsus.com said:
> About CSV, while I'm not opposed to it we have a practice guideline to use
> JSON for machine-parseable output. One reason is that JSON is better at
> being self-describing - the field names give you clues that CSV doesn't. 

CSV is readable by eye without a lot of effort.  JSON is close to encrypted.

Many CSV files have a comment line on top with the field names.


-- 
These are my opinions.  I hate spam.