Forward-planning towards release 1.0

[Eric S. Raymond]

Hal Murray <hmurray at megapathdsl.net>:
> 
> gem at rellim.com said:
> >> I'd vote for getting rid of KERNEL_PLL.
> > Me too, but the alternative has to not suck.  The last test remove was a
> > terrible failure. 
> 
> What "test remove" was that?

I implemented a --disable-kernel-pll option so Gary could test with
KERNEL_PLL and without on otherwise identical platforms.  He reported
the results on IRC. They were pretty horrible.  Already-bad convergence
times went up by orders of magnitude.
-- 
		<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a>