Why do we have an "includes" directory in docs ?
ghane0 at gmail.com
Tue Nov 29 15:05:10 UTC 2016
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 10:29 PM, Sanjeev Gupta <ghane0 at gmail.com> wrote:
> I have fixed most of the misspellings, but there is a bigger issue I am
> facing now. As an example, please see:
> This is generated from confopt.txt , which gets its "Related Links" from:
> which has (an example):
> * link:confopt.html#server[server - configure client association]
> For reasons not clear to me at first sight, the anchor
> "confopt.html#server" does not link back to the right paragraph in
> confopt.html. It goes nowhere, in fact.
I think the answer is at: https://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/guidelines.html#C_8
The toolchain seems to be producing HTML without "id=", and in some cases,
at the wrong place. I have been reading asciidoc documentation all day,
and am quite confused now :-(
for an example of non-intutive-ness. I am pushing some simple fixes now,
but not touching the anchor issue any more (I might break the man pages,
+65 98551208 http://www.linkedin.com/in/ghane
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the devel