waf check -- Should it always run tests?
verm at darkbeer.org
Thu Nov 19 18:37:28 UTC 2015
On 2015-11-19 10:34 -0800, Hal Murray wrote:
> Please set things up so that it runs the tests again, even if nothing has
> changed. (It doesn't have to rebuild things.)
> It's reasonable for tests to use a random number generator so running again
> may not be redundant. Or maybe I'm chasing a weird bug where I'd like to put
> things into a loop for a while to see if I can tickle a timing problem.
I can add a flag to force re-run the tests. Running unrelated tests to the
changes you've made is going to generate a lot of unessicary noise.
More information about the devel