selection of .GPS.
Paul Theodoropoulos
paul at anastrophe.com
Sun Jul 29 19:58:12 UTC 2018
Something I'm still unclear on - my ntpsec server is happily rolling
along with kernel PPS. Dandy. The GPS signal (fudged as close as I can
get it) offset and jitter vacillate wildly, which from experience, is
pretty much 'normal'.
However, as I watch ntpq -p, the selection of GPS vacillates wildly as
well - at one moment selected (+), the next moment 'bad' (x), the next
merely deselected (-).
e.g. (other peers elided simply for brevity):
root at RaspiPi3B+ NTPsec: ~ # ntpq -p
remote refid st t when poll
reach delay offset jitter
=======================================================================================================
*SHM(2) .PPS. 0 l - 1
377 0.0000 0.0000 0.0004
+SHM(0) .GPS. 0 l 1 2
377 0.0000 24.2791 8.5128
root at RaspiPi3B+ NTPsec: ~ # ntpq -p
remote refid st t when poll
reach delay offset jitter
=======================================================================================================
*SHM(2) .PPS. 0 l 1 1
377 0.0000 -0.0004 0.0007
xSHM(0) .GPS. 0 l - 2
377 0.0000 32.2590 10.7885
root at RaspiPi3B+ NTPsec: ~ # ntpq -p
remote refid st t when poll
reach delay offset jitter
=======================================================================================================
*SHM(2) .PPS. 0 l 1 1
377 0.0000 -0.0001 0.0006
xSHM(0) .GPS. 0 l - 2
377 0.0000 32.1088 9.0393
root at RaspiPi3B+ NTPsec: ~ # ntpq -p
remote refid st t when poll
reach delay offset jitter
=======================================================================================================
*SHM(2) .PPS. 0 l - 1
377 0.0000 0.0011 0.0013
-SHM(0) .GPS. 0 l 1 2
377 0.0000 8.2362 22.5395
root at RaspiPi3B+ NTPsec: ~ # ntpq -p
remote refid st t when poll
reach delay offset jitter
=======================================================================================================
*SHM(2) .PPS. 0 l 1 1
377 0.0000 -0.0051 0.0051
xSHM(0) .GPS. 0 l - 2
377 0.0000 16.0547 17.6070
My question is, is this rapid selection/deselection 'harmful' to my
overall accuracy? Would it be better to just set 'noselect' on GPS, to
avoid the constant use/disuse of it? Or is worth listening to, even with
other stable offsite peers?
--
Paul Theodoropoulos
www.anastrophe.com
More information about the users
mailing list