Problem with GPSD refclock

[Gary E. Miller]

Yo Rich!

On Mon, 30 Jan 2017 13:10:58 -0800
Rich Wales <richw at richw.org> wrote:

> But I can still see a possible reason to use SHM(0) -- with a
> reasonable fudge value to bring it into the ballpark, and a high
> stratum value to discourage my local peers from using it except as a
> last resort -- in the (hopefully rare and temporary) situation where
> my GPS signal was degraded *and* my Internet connection was also
> degraded or lost entirely.

Agreed, the trick is how to keep SHM(0) from being selected, except as a
last resort.  As I already said the best way to do that is in dispute.

So please experiment and report back.

RGDS
GARY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703
	gem at rellim.com  Tel:+1 541 382 8588

	    Veritas liberabit vos. -- Quid est veritas?
    "If you can’t measure it, you can’t improve it." - Lord Kelvin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 455 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ntpsec.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20170130/dd77d73f/attachment.bin>