Problem with GPSD refclock

Gary E. Miller gem at
Mon Jan 30 21:21:00 UTC 2017

Yo Rich!

On Mon, 30 Jan 2017 13:10:58 -0800
Rich Wales <richw at> wrote:

> But I can still see a possible reason to use SHM(0) -- with a
> reasonable fudge value to bring it into the ballpark, and a high
> stratum value to discourage my local peers from using it except as a
> last resort -- in the (hopefully rare and temporary) situation where
> my GPS signal was degraded *and* my Internet connection was also
> degraded or lost entirely.

Agreed, the trick is how to keep SHM(0) from being selected, except as a
last resort.  As I already said the best way to do that is in dispute.

So please experiment and report back.

Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703
	gem at  Tel:+1 541 382 8588

	    Veritas liberabit vos. -- Quid est veritas?
    "If you can’t measure it, you can’t improve it." - Lord Kelvin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 455 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <>

More information about the users mailing list