Re: ✘Python 2.7 broken

[James Browning]

On Sat, Dec 12, 2020, at 5:53 PM Gary E. Miller via devel <devel at ntpsec.org>
wrote:

> Yo Richard!
>
> On Sat, 12 Dec 2020 19:46:22 -0600
> Richard Laager via devel <devel at ntpsec.org> wrote:
>
> > On 12/12/20 7:07 PM, Gary E. Miller via devel wrote:
> > > NTPsec git head broke Python 2.7, badly.
> >
> > I believe James B is looking at test failures under certain
> > conditions, but I've never been able to reproduce them. I wonder if
> > this is that issue. Do the installed binaries break in the same way
> > when run normally, or are they only broken at the test step?
>
> Installed python files run fine.  The pure python module runs fine
> installed.
>
> > Are you able to provide a commit where this works and preferably
> > bisect this? I wonder if it's the FFI change or something else.
>
> It is not FFI related as it breaks all the Python utilities.
>
> Not sure how to test the FFI installed FFI.. ntpc.so still getting
> installed in the wrong place (/usr/local/lib64/python2.7/site-packages)
> and the versions .so not being created (ntpc.so.1, etc.) even when I run
> ldconfig.  Since the file is not in the right place ldconfig does not
> know to look there.  Nor should it.
>
> Bisecting will take a while.  I have a new RasPi4 that is requiring
> my time to get right.
>

It looks like a4c2c7921f144674402c2a3dbfc13a87b1ea3d1f can you confirm?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ntpsec.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20201212/7e6f783e/attachment.htm>