ublox refclock

[Eric S. Raymond]

Gary E. Miller via devel <devel at ntpsec.org>:
> > So there is nothing you recommend be merged at this time?
> 
> I sorta wish NTPsec had a staging area like the Linux kernel does.
> 
> There is value to a small and clean u-blox driver fully integrated
> into NTPsec.  But without KPPS it is inferior at timekeeping.
> 
> If the guy that wrote it wanted to work on it under the NTPsec umbrella
> that would be good.  A little guidance and the guy that wrote that could
> be very useful to NTPsec.
> 
> Without that guy, or someone interested in being that guy. I'd pass on
> that driver.  I'm not personally interested in upgrading that software to
> have the smarts that gpsd already does about the u-blox and KPPS.

I left an issue on his tracker about merging to upstream.  If he responds
I will try to bring him into the fold. If he does not, from what you say there
os not much loss hrere.
-- 
		<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a>


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.ntpsec.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20191125/538e8052/attachment.bin>