How not to design a wire protocol

[Eric S. Raymond]

Daniel Franke <dfoxfranke at gmail.com>:
> On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 2:37 AM Daniel Franke <dfoxfranke at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I'll post a rebuttal sometime later this week. As for IETF processes,
> > though, you're years late. The WG already had a consensus call in 2016
> > on what NTS-KE's framing format should look like, and it was
> > unanimous. You can still comment during IETF Last Call and try to
> > convince the IESG to block the document from advancing, but you're not
> > likely to be taken seriously there; the IETF publishes new binary
> > protocols all the time.
> 
> Rebuttal here: http://esr.ibiblio.org/?p=8254&cpage=1#comment-2202914

I'll comment on the blog.
-- 
		<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a>

My work is funded by the Internet Civil Engineering Institute: https://icei.org
Please visit their site and donate: the civilization you save might be your own.