What's left to doo on NTS

[Gary E. Miller]

Yo Hal!

On Fri, 01 Mar 2019 21:46:56 -0800
Hal Murray via devel <devel at ntpsec.org> wrote:

> Gary said:
> > Because that is the initial use case.  If each ntpd had nts-ke in
> > it then there would be no need for such a complicated protocol.  
> 
> > The way Mark explained it to me, you want one NTS-KE per aisle, or
> > per rack. That limits the number of servers, with keys, that need
> > to be protected.   
> 
> Mark, would you please explain/expand.  Thanks.

I think Achim answered this.  Did his email make sense?

RGDS
GARY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703
	gem at rellim.com  Tel:+1 541 382 8588

	    Veritas liberabit vos. -- Quid est veritas?
    "If you can’t measure it, you can’t improve it." - Lord Kelvin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 851 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ntpsec.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20190302/d62b1748/attachment-0001.bin>