ntp.conf changes for NTS

[Gary E. Miller]

Yo Eric!

On Thu, 31 Jan 2019 15:18:56 -0500
"Eric S. Raymond" <esr at thyrsus.com> wrote:

> Gary E. Miller via devel <devel at ntpsec.org>:
> > Next virtual meeting of the NTP WG is Feb 12.  Maybe we should get
> > some of these issues on their agenda?  
> 
> If there's another revision in process, 

Dunno about that.  All we can do is explain our issues.

> I want to object to the binary
> request format.  Raises endianness issues for no good reason.  Better
> to use something like Motorola S-records for this.

We prolly need to start a doc somewhere for what we want answered.

IMHO I see no issues with the binary format.  Network protocols have dealt
with network byte order for a long time.  I only object to what they
left unspecified or ignored.

RGDS
GARY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703
	gem at rellim.com  Tel:+1 541 382 8588

	    Veritas liberabit vos. -- Quid est veritas?
    "If you can’t measure it, you can’t improve it." - Lord Kelvin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 851 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ntpsec.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20190131/7e4553bc/attachment.bin>