lockclock
Hal Murray
hmurray at megapathdsl.net
Thu Jan 10 11:37:56 UTC 2019
Eric said:
> Heh. I've been pretty ruthless about dropping every line of code I could.
> Did it occur to you to wonder why I hadn't already nuked this?
> It's because the only way this code makes any sense to me is if at one point
> NIST was running NTP Classic on the master fountain clock. For all we know
> they might still be doing that.
I expect the lockclock code is a partnership between Dave Mills and Judah
Levine at NIST.
> This is an NTPsec use case we *absolutely* want to encourage. What better
> reference user could we have?
> So, yes, we're going to support that (unless Mark knows some compelling
> reason we shouldn't, which I doubt). If NIST comes asking us for help we want
> to be able to say "Yes, *sir*. At your service, *sir*."
I'd considered it, but not thought things through. I think the best way we
can get a foot in at high volume sites like NIST is through a high performance
server. That's probably why I sent that message at about the same time.
Suppose we split the client/server parts of ntpd. We need some way to get
info from the client to the server. I was assuming that pathway could handle
the lockclock case too.
-----------
Subject: Re: ntpd: program structure
esr at thyrsus.com said:
> The biggest problem with any attempt to break up ntpd into multiple separate
> programs is that it would almost necessarily force changes in the way NTP
> configuration works that would be (a) user-visible, and (b) not backward
> compatible. The only ways around having such a configuration break I was
> able to think up were so complicated and ugly that they seemed like
> non-starters in themselves.
I've been assuming that sites using lockclock are big/important and willing to
put in a little work to get significant benefits. Yes, it's easier if the old
ntp.conf works.
If we are serious about supporting lockclock, we have to figure out a way to
test it. We can probably make something that supports GPSDOs with PPS.
Another potential target is sites with PTP.
--
These are my opinions. I hate spam.
More information about the devel
mailing list