First steps towards NTPv5

[Eric S. Raymond]

Richard Laager via devel <devel at ntpsec.org>:
> Is there a particular reason this needs to be handled right now?

No.  But I had some deasd time wile waur=ing for CI to unjam.  

> For what it's worth, I think this should wait until NTS is done. NTPv5
> is going to require IETF action. Both the NTPsec developers and the IETF
> people should be working on completing NTS before biting off another
> project.

*Implementation* should absolutely wait until NTS is done. But I figured
other people had dead time due to the busted CI, too.  Not a terrible
idea to use it on forward design.
-- 
		<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a>

My work is funded by the Internet Civil Engineering Institute: https://icei.org
Please visit their site and donate: the civilization you save might be your own.