Should two-digit years be fatal to a refclock?

Richard Laager rlaager at wiktel.com
Wed Feb 6 08:49:58 UTC 2019


On 2/6/19 1:52 AM, Hal Murray wrote:
> You can also try fudging it by 1024*7*24*60*60

Sure, and we discussed that in the bug. I was just giving an algorithm
to deal with it automatically.

-- 
Richard


More information about the devel mailing list