NTS client configuration support has landed

[Gary E. Miller]

Yo Achim!

On Sat, 02 Feb 2019 10:43:33 +0100
Achim Gratz via devel <devel at ntpsec.org> wrote:

> Hal Murray via devel writes:
> >> You might be right, but I'm not going to design on the assumption
> >> that you are because the payoff matrix is too asymmetrical.   
> >
> > Just because the current pool is untrustworthy doesn't mean that
> > somebody couldn't run a trusted pool.  
> 
> No, in fact my expectation is that the ntpsec implementation should
> support an NTS pool.

Which does not exist, and will take years for an RFC to create.

> > Keep in mind that pool+nts isn't well specified yet.  
> 
> I agree, but it's specified well enough to work.

Ah, no.  Use the current pool with NTS and you blow away all the advantages
of NTS.  Don't go there.

RGDS
GARY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703
	gem at rellim.com  Tel:+1 541 382 8588

	    Veritas liberabit vos. -- Quid est veritas?
    "If you can’t measure it, you can’t improve it." - Lord Kelvin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 851 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ntpsec.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20190202/a2b2a380/attachment.bin>