Implementing NTS options
Gary E. Miller
gem at rellim.com
Sat Feb 2 05:36:46 UTC 2019
Yo Eric!
On Sat, 2 Feb 2019 00:30:07 -0500 (EST)
"Eric S. Raymond via devel" <devel at ntpsec.org> wrote:
> >*tls1.2* Allow TLS1.2 connection.
> >
> >*tls1.3* Allow TLS1.3 connection.
>
> They'd be easy, but I have two issues with these. First, I want
> embedded punctuation out of the names - I don't want that
> defect-attractor/complexity-escalator in the scanner. I don't care
> what they're named otherwise.
This is why you should not implement while the syntax is worked out.
Richard had many good ideas. None of this is settled.
> Second, why would you ever want one of these allow bits off?
Please read my long email to Richard so I do not have to repeat myself.
> If nobody has a convincing story, they stay out until we get an RFE
> from a real user. KISS principle.
Already sent to the list previously.
> >*tls1.3ciphers [list]* List of TLS 1.3 ciphers to negotiate, in
> >prefered order. TLS 1.2 and 1.3 ciphers are different and must be
> >specified separately as OpenSSL needs them separately.
>
> Again. The barrier to entry for these is higher because they
> would need a non-trivial grammar modification. Tell me a real use
> case; explain why we should pay the complexity cost before we get
> an RFE from a real user.
Real use case? Because they are required by multiple RFCs. We
are supposed to be implementing the RFCs. Right?
> >*ntpciphers [list]* List of ciphers to negotiate, in prefered order
> >for the NTPD connection. The server must support
> >AEAD_AES_SIV_CMAC_256.
>
> And again. OK name this time, but still looks like gingerbread and
> chrome to me.
As required in the Proposed RFC. As documented in nts.adoc for at least
a week. Please read ALL the doc, and online discussion, before saying
things are not completely laid out.
RGDS
GARY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703
gem at rellim.com Tel:+1 541 382 8588
Veritas liberabit vos. -- Quid est veritas?
"If you can’t measure it, you can’t improve it." - Lord Kelvin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 851 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ntpsec.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20190201/0d00f5b2/attachment.bin>
More information about the devel
mailing list