Point release of NTPSec

[Hal Murray]

devel at ntpsec.org said:
>> Or maybe wait for the NTS RFC to come out so we have a good
>> reason for the release.
> What is the official (or barring that, consensus) view on the quality of NTS
> in NTPsec? Is it something that is usable in production? If so, please cut a
> release sooner rather than later. If it's still experimental, a release is
> less critical. 

I think the code is in good shape.  I don't know of any reason not to use it 
in production.  (aside from the normal growing pains, like #606)

My comment was intended to suggest waiting for a big (1.2) release after doing 
a little release (1.1.7) soon.


-- 
These are my opinions.  I hate spam.