Why admin's do not trust daemons to do their own packet filtering
    Eric S. Raymond 
    esr at thyrsus.com
       
    Tue May 29 20:02:45 UTC 2018
    
    
  
Hal Murray via devel <devel at ntpsec.org>:
> 
> > We could kill the interface command, and let the usual syntax error happen.
> > Or we could raise a special syntax error, calling out the need to use the
> > packet filter instead.  Then the question becomes, is it a warn-and-continue,
> >  or a error-and-halt? 
> 
> Error and halt.  (or set a flag to halt after the rest of the parsing)
> 
> This is a security issue.  We don't want to let evil packets in.
I concur.  If we're going to drop this command it should fail loudly and hard.
-- 
		<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a>
My work is funded by the Internet Civil Engineering Institute: https://icei.org
Please visit their site and donate: the civilization you save might be your own.
    
    
More information about the devel
mailing list