Request for data / ntpsnmpd report

[Ian Bruene]

On 02/01/2018 11:22 AM, Mark Atwood, Project Manager wrote:
> The SNMP MIB RFCs are notorious for including magic blue sky values 
> and measurements that nobody knows how to measure and that are not 
> well defined.
>
> For things that don't make enough sense, it's ok to not implement that 
> particular snmp variable.
>
> As for the "Check if ntpd configuration changed", that appears to me 
> to be a good example of "poorly defined". "When did this host get a 
> new IP number" is better retrieved from one of the system MIBs.   It's 
> okay to not implement it.

Good to know, I will strike the config-change trap from the 
implementation until a better solution is found.

-- 
/"In the end; what separates a Man, from a Slave? Money? Power? No. A 
Man Chooses, a Slave Obeys."/ -- Andrew Ryan

/"Utopia cannot precede the Utopian. It will exist the moment we are fit 
to occupy it."/ -- Sophia Lamb

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ntpsec.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20180211/6027d4d7/attachment.html>