LKM Timemark Driver

Gary E. Miller gem at
Tue Aug 28 03:36:34 UTC 2018

Yo MLewis!

On Mon, 27 Aug 2018 23:17:06 -0400
MLewis via devel <devel at> wrote:

> You don't need a precise
> Pi interrupt, you don't even need any Pi interrupt. The precision is
> in obtaining the kernel timestamp and the timemark.

No need to keep repeating what we already agree on.  Time to move onto
what we can determine experimentally.

> I'm wanting numbers.

We all do!  As soon as you have any LKM patches against the RasPi
4.14 kernel I'll test them.

Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703
	gem at  Tel:+1 541 382 8588

	    Veritas liberabit vos. -- Quid est veritas?
    "If you can’t measure it, you can’t improve it." - Lord Kelvin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 851 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <>

More information about the devel mailing list