LKM Timemark Driver

[Gary E. Miller]

Yo MLewis!

On Mon, 27 Aug 2018 23:17:06 -0400
MLewis via devel <devel at ntpsec.org> wrote:

> You don't need a precise
> Pi interrupt, you don't even need any Pi interrupt. The precision is
> in obtaining the kernel timestamp and the timemark.

No need to keep repeating what we already agree on.  Time to move onto
what we can determine experimentally.

> I'm wanting numbers.

We all do!  As soon as you have any LKM patches against the RasPi
4.14 kernel I'll test them.

RGDS
GARY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703
	gem at rellim.com  Tel:+1 541 382 8588

	    Veritas liberabit vos. -- Quid est veritas?
    "If you can’t measure it, you can’t improve it." - Lord Kelvin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 851 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ntpsec.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20180827/6bbc0ecf/attachment.bin>