LKM Timemark Driver
Gary E. Miller
gem at rellim.com
Tue Aug 28 03:36:34 UTC 2018
Yo MLewis!
On Mon, 27 Aug 2018 23:17:06 -0400
MLewis via devel <devel at ntpsec.org> wrote:
> You don't need a precise
> Pi interrupt, you don't even need any Pi interrupt. The precision is
> in obtaining the kernel timestamp and the timemark.
No need to keep repeating what we already agree on. Time to move onto
what we can determine experimentally.
> I'm wanting numbers.
We all do! As soon as you have any LKM patches against the RasPi
4.14 kernel I'll test them.
RGDS
GARY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703
gem at rellim.com Tel:+1 541 382 8588
Veritas liberabit vos. -- Quid est veritas?
"If you can’t measure it, you can’t improve it." - Lord Kelvin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 851 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ntpsec.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20180827/6bbc0ecf/attachment.bin>
More information about the devel
mailing list