Tinkerboard

[Gary E. Miller]

Yo Hal!

On Mon, 18 Sep 2017 15:24:25 -0700
Hal Murray <hmurray at megapathdsl.net> wrote:

> > Sure, test/run as you wish, but why not build them all?  
> 
> No great reason.  I got started that way ages ago.

So why should we work to allow pointless things?
 
> It seems like a good idea for somebody to test the not-all case.

The all and not all case do get a lot of testing.

> I think we should be able to build non-bloat systems, or at least 
> minimal-bloat.  This seems like a good step in that direction.

Yes, but then why allow an infinite number of in between combinations?
Especially since they are combinatorially unverifiable.

RGDS
GARY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703
	gem at rellim.com  Tel:+1 541 382 8588

	    Veritas liberabit vos. -- Quid est veritas?
    "If you can’t measure it, you can’t improve it." - Lord Kelvin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ntpsec.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20170918/129c3ef5/attachment.bin>