NetBSD 6.1.5 doesn't have ldexpl in math.h
Gary E. Miller
gem at rellim.com
Fri Sep 15 01:32:26 UTC 2017
Yo Eric!
On Thu, 14 Sep 2017 21:26:46 -0400
"Eric S. Raymond via devel" <devel at ntpsec.org> wrote:
> Fred Wright via devel <devel at ntpsec.org>:
> > IMO, if a proper cost-benefit analysis of the use of long doubles
> > in the NTP context were conducted, it would result in a resounding
> > thumbs down.
> Best to avoid any doubt about precision and perform all the
> computations as long double or better as timespec(64).
I'm all in favor of timespec(64). Just not this month.
> That said, I'm going to push - not hard, not hill-to-die-on, just
> moderately - for remaining strict about our C99 conformance policy
> and culling old releases/minor platforms that can't meet it.
+1.
RGDS
GARY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703
gem at rellim.com Tel:+1 541 382 8588
Veritas liberabit vos. -- Quid est veritas?
"If you can’t measure it, you can’t improve it." - Lord Kelvin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ntpsec.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20170914/6a38ca21/attachment.bin>
More information about the devel
mailing list