NetBSD 6.1.5 doesn't have ldexpl in math.h

[Hal Murray]

> No, NTP doesn't do anything interesting here.  The code predates the era
> whend long double was standardized and generally available, a transition
> that might have been as late as C99. 

So it seems reasonable to assume that it's OK to run without the extra 
precision.

The case I was worried about was where cleaning up that area we accidentally 
lost the precision.


Do you (or Mark) have any opinions on whether I should push the fix?  It 
pokes a tiny hole in the we-need-C99 position.


-- 
These are my opinions.  I hate spam.