seccomp on Raspberry Pi

[Gary E. Miller]

Yo Hal!

On Mon, 15 May 2017 17:53:02 -0700
Hal Murray <hmurray at megapathdsl.net> wrote:

> >> Is it actually working, or just didn't crash?  
> > I assume the former from the later.  
> 
> Bogus assumption.  (which is why I sent that message)

Yes, and thank you for helping me nail it down.

> But that brings up the issue of should it crash?

I would think if seccomp init fails, it should exit with an error.

I hate security things that fail silently, leaving you naked when you
thought you were protected.

> And should waf crash if it won't build?

Ditto.  Does it not now?

> > Any tests I should run?  
> Only look in the log files.

I'm guessing there will be some dependency on runtime and compile-time
options?

RGDS
GARY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703
	gem at rellim.com  Tel:+1 541 382 8588

	    Veritas liberabit vos. -- Quid est veritas?
    "If you can’t measure it, you can’t improve it." - Lord Kelvin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ntpsec.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20170515/81ca3508/attachment.bin>