More SNMP dependency questions, also assertions. [FWD because reply error]

[Mark Atwood]

yes, this is to be an agentx implementation

On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 12:43 PM Gary E. Miller via devel <devel at ntpsec.org>
wrote:

> Yo Ian!
>
> On Mon, 1 May 2017 21:09:08 -0500
> Ian Bruene via devel <devel at ntpsec.org> wrote:
>
> > > Do you intend to make this an snmp agent that would run under an
> > > existing net-snmp daemon and communicate via the AgentX (RFC2741)
> > > protocol?  Or are you thinking of a stand-alone snmp daemon?
> >
> > I assumed a standalone program, but I had no knowledge of other
> > options.
>
>
> On any system under remote management you can assume the SNMP port is
> already in use.  So AgentX is the way to go.
>
> RGDS
> GARY
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703
>         gem at rellim.com  Tel:+1 541 382 8588 <(541)%20382-8588>
>
>             Veritas liberabit vos. -- Quid est veritas?
>     "If you can’t measure it, you can’t improve it." - Lord Kelvin
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> devel at ntpsec.org
> http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

-- 

Mark Atwood
http://about.me/markatwood
+1-206-604-2198 SMS & Signal
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ntpsec.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20170505/9af96afa/attachment.html>