Do we need a few new types?

[Gary E. Miller]

Yo Eric!

On Sat, 11 Mar 2017 08:55:06 -0500
"Eric S. Raymond" <esr at thyrsus.com> wrote:

> Hal Murray <hmurray at megapathdsl.net>:
> > I think we want something like ntp_time32_t and ntp_time64_t.
> > 
> > I'm looking for something that will tell the reader that it's a
> > seconds since NTP epoch, parallel but different from a POSIX
> > time_t.  
> 
> Reasonable.  If you eantee to create and speread around, say,
> ntp_secs32_t and ntp_secs64_t, I would not object.

So now we get a 96 bit l_fp?

RGDS
GARY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703
	gem at rellim.com  Tel:+1 541 382 8588

	    Veritas liberabit vos. -- Quid est veritas?
    "If you can’t measure it, you can’t improve it." - Lord Kelvin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ntpsec.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20170311/ded907e5/attachment.bin>