receive time stamps - current status
Eric S. Raymond
esr at thyrsus.com
Sun Jun 11 11:40:26 UTC 2017
Hal Murray <hmurray at megapathdsl.net>:
>
> I remove the SO_BINTIME mode. It's only supported by FreeBSD and they don't
> support it for IPv6. They do support SO_TIMESTAMP.
>
> The downside of that is reduced resolution on the time stamps. BINTIME gives
> 32 bit fractions of a second while TIMESTAMP gives microseconds (roughly 20
> bits). We could get the extra resolution for IPv4, but the extra complexity
> of the code doesn't seem worth it.
Agreed.
> The current code assumes that we have either SO_TIMESTAMP or SO_TIMESTAMPNS.
> So far SO_TIMESTAMPNS is Linux only. Configure doesn't check. It should die
> at build time.
>
> So far, Solaris is the only OS I know of where we have encountered troubles.
> See Issue #342
> https://gitlab.com/NTPsec/ntpsec/issues/342
>
> I'm assuming gcc on Solaris will get fixed.
>
> The current code will require intervention when we discover an OS/environment
> where it doesn't work. So far, with a sample size of 1 (or maybe 1/2), the
> solution is to fix the waf recipe. When we get a test case where that
> doesn't work we can figure out how to handle it.
>
> It would not be hard to make things build and run without receive time
> stamps. It might work poorly under heavy load, but we've been running that
> way for 6 months and nobody complained.
>
> I think time stamps are important so I haven't implemented any way to run
> without them. If we need that, one option would be to add a configure option
> such as --disable-timestamps.
Half-anticipating such problems is why I isolated the timestamp getter to
is own module. That reduced the chances that stirring this pot will damage
something else.
As you say, "we've been running that way for 6 months and nobody
complained." I was rather expecting that the induced jitter would
be well below normal NTP accuracy expectations.
Hm, I think I'll add a comment about that in the internals tour.
--
<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a>
Please consider contributing to my Patreon page at https://www.patreon.com/esr
so I can keep the invisible wheels of the Internet turning. Give generously -
the civilization you save might be your own.
More information about the devel
mailing list