Heads up: USE_PACKET_TIMESTAMP tangle

Wed Jun 7 06:57:13 UTC 2017

That is worth filing a bug against BSD for.

On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 9:41 PM Hal Murray via devel <devel at ntpsec.org>
wrote:

>
> FreeBSD supports both SO_BINTIME and SO_TIMESTAMP
>
> SO_BINTIME provides 32 bits of fractions of a second.
> SO_TIMESTAMP provides microseconds - timeval.
>
> So the code is setup to prefer SO_BINTIME.
>
> Unfortunately,SO_BINTIME doesn't seem to work for IPv6.  ??
>
> I've disabled SO_BINTIME so it will use SO_TIMESTAMP.  Back to testing.
>
> --
> These are my opinions.  I hate spam.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> devel at ntpsec.org
> http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
-- 

Mark Atwood
http://about.me/markatwood
+1-206-604-2198 SMS & Signal
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ntpsec.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20170607/caca932c/attachment.html>