Are we interested in supporting low resolution system clocks?

[Gary E. Miller]

Yo Hal!

On Tue, 06 Jun 2017 16:49:57 -0700
Hal Murray via devel <devel at ntpsec.org> wrote:

> ntpd has a lot of ugly code to fuzz the clock.  I don't really
> understand that area.  I think it makes sense if the clock has big
> ticks.  Do we want to support those systems?  If not, I think we can
> clean up a lot of tiny code chunks.

I have run tests removing the fuzz code.  Never found any change with or
without the clock fuzz.  I was too scared to remove it.

RGDS
GARY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703
	gem at rellim.com  Tel:+1 541 382 8588

	    Veritas liberabit vos. -- Quid est veritas?
    "If you can’t measure it, you can’t improve it." - Lord Kelvin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ntpsec.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20170606/ef369c78/attachment.bin>