ntpsec | Extra precision for avgint field in ntpmon (#247)
hmurray at megapathdsl.net
Wed Feb 22 12:09:13 UTC 2017
I can't figure out what's going on.
I claim the issue was bogus. The code as it was before your change was
We (at least I) want the extra precision so we can tell how bad abusive
clients are. I sent something saying that, but it didn't make it to the
Subject: Re: ntpsec | Extra precision for avgint field in ntpmon (#247)
From: Hal Murray <hmurray at megapathdsl.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 23:41:33 -0800
To: NTPsec / ntpsec <incoming+de76447fa58c87382b0bb5f061d57b6f at gitlab.com>
Cc: hmurray at megapathdsl.net
> avgint should be an integer, not a float.
That change is a feature, not a bug. Otherwise you can't tell how abusive
the bad guys are.
The first part is in classic, but the extra digit for under 1 sec isn't there
$ ntpq -nc "mrulist mincount=1000 sort=avgint" | more
Ctrl-C will stop MRU retrieval and display partial results.
lstint avgint rstr r m v count rport remote address
31563 0.054 90 . 3 4 1278 51028 126.96.36.199
56670 0.055 90 . 3 4 2606 50692 188.8.131.52
73116 0.056 90 . 3 3 2692 57520 184.108.40.206
41847 0.068 90 . 3 3 2199 41144 220.127.116.11
> I pushed rthis change. It tracks a post-fork revision in Classic.
I can't figure out what that is supposed to mean. My first reading was that "this change" meant you were copying the code from Classic. But that doesn't make sense since it was already there.
You seem to have removed the code I want, so maybe "this change" means a change implementing the request in the subject of the issue (which I claim is bogus).
These are my opinions. I hate spam.
More information about the devel