Should the HAVE_KERNEL_PLL conditional be abolished?

Eric S. Raymond esr at
Sun Dec 3 20:56:38 UTC 2017

Hal Murray <hmurray at>:
> The "HAVE_KERNEL_PLL" is used for both of them even though there is nothing 
> PLL related to the first usage.

I'm aware.  There's a separate HAVE_KERNEL_PPS that conditionalizes the
code for the second case.
		<a href="">Eric S. Raymond</a>

My work is funded by the Internet Civil Engineering Institute:
Please visit their site and donate: the civilization you save might be your own.

More information about the devel mailing list