Work item list: l_fp_time and l_fp_offset
Hal Murray
hmurray at megapathdsl.net
Wed Apr 26 20:12:48 UTC 2017
Achim said:
<> I think that should be rejected in favor of eliminating l_fp except at the
>> very edge and doing the pivot at the edge.
> What exactly do you suggest to replace it with?
There are two uses for l_fp: time and offset.
By pushing it to the edge, we eliminate uses as time.
I would be happy with a double for offsets.
Gary wants a timespec to preserve accuracy. That only matters if the offset
is huge. The only time that happens is during a giant initial step. I'm
willing to live with that.
--
These are my opinions. I hate spam.
More information about the devel
mailing list