Work item list: l_fp_time and l_fp_offset

Hal Murray hmurray at megapathdsl.net
Wed Apr 26 20:12:48 UTC 2017


Achim said:
<> I think that should be rejected in favor of eliminating l_fp except at the 
>> very edge and doing the pivot at the edge.
> What exactly do you suggest to replace it with?

There are two uses for l_fp: time and offset.

By pushing it to the edge, we eliminate uses as time.

I would be happy with a double for offsets.

Gary wants a timespec to preserve accuracy.  That only matters if the offset 
is huge.  The only time that happens is during a giant initial step.  I'm 
willing to live with that.



-- 
These are my opinions.  I hate spam.





More information about the devel mailing list