Deciding what modes to keep.

[Gary E. Miller]

Yo Daniel!

On Fri, 30 Sep 2016 14:50:12 -0400
Daniel Franke <dfoxfranke at gmail.com> wrote:

> An empty specification in my new language has different semantics than
> an empty specification in the old language so at some point there will
> have to be a flag day as to which way it is interpreted, but I don't
> think this is as big a deal as you've made it out to be.

I think it is a big deal.  UNtil we have our own rabid base of followers
the only way NTPsec grows is by taking NTP Classic users.  They will
want a drop in replacement.

So any upward extensible is fine, but trivial back-compatibility is
essential.


RGDS
GARY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703
	gem at rellim.com  Tel:+1 541 382 8588
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.ntpsec.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20160930/d587dd1d/attachment.bin>