Proposal - drop the GPSD JSON driver

[Mark Atwood]

Hi!

I've been following this discussion.

We should remove the GPSD JSON driver from NTPsec.

It is an attractive nuisance.  The SHM driver, possibly with improvements,
is a better interface between NTPsec and GPSD.

..m

On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 2:53 PM Eric S. Raymond <esr at thyrsus.com> wrote:

> Hal Murray <hmurray at megapathdsl.net>:
> >
> > esr at thyrsus.com said:
> > >> Yes, I've been thinking about mechanisms for this.  They're all rather
> > >> irrelevant.
> > > Argh.  I meant "inelegant".
> >
> > I assume that using a pipe or socket rather than SHM would fix that.
>
> Probably, but then we run unto buffering jitter again.
>
> You're right, we need to build some test jigs and measure this stuff.
>
> I'll make a publishable white paper out of it.
> --
>                 <a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> devel at ntpsec.org
> http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ntpsec.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20161021/bce16921/attachment.html>