TESTFRAME is dead. This accelerates us some.
hmurray at megapathdsl.net
Wed Oct 5 22:51:33 UTC 2016
esr at thyrsus.com said:
>> As I understand things, the recent problem for TESTFRAME was the overlap
>> between adjtimex and ntp_adjtime.
> Not quite. It's the fact that with KERNEL_PLL enabled, the capture files
> will have an event in the stream that won't replay properly on a
> non-KERNEL_PLL system, and vice-versa - the code path through replay will be
> incompatibly different.
Even without OS X, I think TESTFRAME would be worth more effort. It would
cover Linux, NetBSD, FreeBSD. That would cover new OS/distro releases with
new tool chains as well as 32 vs 64 and Intel vs ARM.
These are my opinions. I hate spam.
More information about the devel